Lana Lang - Page 2

Guest · 11-24-2007, 01:03 AM

Oh, you mean it's Clarks fault. I thought you were blaming Lana.

cecil44 · 11-24-2007, 05:21 AM

ok...I'm lost! How did you translate what was just said to being Clark's fault? First lets look at the circumstances where Lana said that the rest of the world might need him: She had just been thrown from a roof of a building by someone who wanted Clark to save the world... Lionel had also told her that she needs to let Clark go, before it's too late. So whatever way you look at it, she was not saying anything Clark has not been told before, and she was only saying it because she was told the same thing by others. But yes, I give her credit for that too... suddenly she's intelligent, wow! But Chloe has always made Clark see that the rest of the world needs him. Even when he was worried about Chloe, Chloe always said "Go, Smallville needs you more than I do" ...or "Go, I'll be fine..." etc. She makes him into Superman. The thing with Lana is that she wants Clark to live with her on the farm... her words were "some day the world may need you more than I do..." Note: "SOME DAY" not today, not now, but someday... which could mean in ten, twenty, a hundred years from now/ who knows? Lana makes everyone dumber...and she is never blamed, just like you guest are trying to blame Clark. True he's a dumb dumb alien around Lana, but he's superman when she's gone. So Lana should visit Pete in Wichita or wherever he moved to...and leave Clark to face his destiny! Besides that Clana has been beaten with a stick to a point where now all teh chemistry is gone and burried. Something new that does not involve Lana-worshipping is all we are asking for! Maybe some evil Lex? or a Supermanly Clark? how about a Lois reporter???

Batfan114 · 11-24-2007, 06:42 AM

now,now lets hurt innocent bystanders. My friend what the ladies are trying to say is this. First of all lets try with another character. Do you remember how the Luthers were in the first few episodes. They were ruthless. They would kill or have killed off anyone who crosses them. Some one stole from them and they were found dead in some other city. Now lets go to lana,

Batfan114 · 11-24-2007, 06:47 AM

Now lets go to lana, she stole 10 million from lex, tried to frame him and kiddnapped lionel. Yet the luthors some how are her loose their brains and balls and let her live. All they did was threaten her. WOW that did alot of good. The writers are going backwards here. The 2 most ruthless people ever and here they are letting the squirel girl go. that's what cecil44 and kishagirl92 are trying to say. For some reason people get dumb and gutless around this twit and it has to stop. When she's not around all is well. So get rid of her.

Batfan114 · 11-24-2007, 06:50 AM

lets have her horribly disfigured in some explosion and see if this theory that lana's minions here have that her beauty is what's important. Lets see if she's still loved by all who worship her beauty since that's their main argument. Oh but she soo beautiful. Well lets take that away and see if everything else she does holds any more merit.

Guest · 11-24-2007, 09:09 AM

Read the message I responded to and you won't need to ask. It said it was Clark's fault, not Lana's.

kishagirl92 · 11-24-2007, 10:16 AM

The fault is on both Lana and Clark. The final decision to stay there on the farm is Clark's fault for being stupid, but the CAUSE of that final decision was Lana (her presence turns everyone into retards) which is why she is to be blamed as well. Just like in Batfan's case of the Luthors, the fault is on both Lana and the Luthors. The decision not to blast her ass after all she did is the Luthors fault for being stupid, but the CAUSE of that decision was Lana (everyone has bigger balls when she's not around). You know that Clark would never condone thievery, attempted murder, fraud, or kipnapping. These are serious crimes no matter what the cir!@#!@stances are, but he would for his precious Lana. In her presence he suddenly loses his intelligence when it comes to decision making. He is supposed to be morally just no matter what.

kishagirl92 · 11-24-2007, 10:17 AM

And you know that the Luthors would never let anyone who victimized them the way she did off the hook. Like Cecil said, more people have died by their hands for doing much much less worse than that. The Luthors are ruthless. Oh, but not when it comes to Lana. They dare not touch her. She's the Lolly-Pop Pink Princess of Smallville. oops, I'm sorry.. That's Lanaville. She doesn't have to suffer for any of her consequences. Let's just put the blame on someone else so she won't have to suffer, let's just call it even, it was my fault, you can commit as many crimes as you want your highness and I shall suffer all the consequences for you. PLEASE!! Never in a million years would the Luthors do that for anyone else.... only in the presence of her highness do they get all soft and cushy and lose all their balls!!!!

kishagirl92 · 11-24-2007, 10:17 AM

I'm gonna re-issue the warning label that should always be attached to her forehead: "CAUTION!!! MAY CAUSE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS: MASSIVE BRAIN DAMAGE; LOSS OF TESTICLES; SERIOUS RETARDATION; EVEN DEATH (if you cross her); EXTREMELY ADDICTIVE. KEEP AWAY. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED". LOL!!!! Seriously, she's eventually gonna have to ride out anyway if Clark is to become who he is supposed to be and if Lex is to become who he is supposed to be. Speaking of which, Lana's death would be the perfect jump start for both of them to move in the direction of their destinies and become the definitive enemies that they are destined to be!

Batfan114 · 11-24-2007, 12:40 PM

I say jullian kills lana thinking it would make him look good to lex. Lex kills jullian, and he can now go on to being his destine evil self. Clark would be up set and would never want anyone going through that pain since he loved the holy squirrel so he becomes superman. Then every one can move on with their destiny.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-24-2007, 01:03 AM	#11
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	Oh, you mean it's Clarks fault. I thought you were blaming Lana.

11-24-2007, 05:21 AM	#12
cecil44 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 788	ok...I'm lost! How did you translate what was just said to being Clark's fault? First lets look at the circumstances where Lana said that the rest of the world might need him: She had just been thrown from a roof of a building by someone who wanted Clark to save the world... Lionel had also told her that she needs to let Clark go, before it's too late. So whatever way you look at it, she was not saying anything Clark has not been told before, and she was only saying it because she was told the same thing by others. But yes, I give her credit for that too... suddenly she's intelligent, wow! But Chloe has always made Clark see that the rest of the world needs him. Even when he was worried about Chloe, Chloe always said "Go, Smallville needs you more than I do" ...or "Go, I'll be fine..." etc. She makes him into Superman. The thing with Lana is that she wants Clark to live with her on the farm... her words were "some day the world may need you more than I do..." Note: "SOME DAY" not today, not now, but someday... which could mean in ten, twenty, a hundred years from now/ who knows? Lana makes everyone dumber...and she is never blamed, just like you guest are trying to blame Clark. True he's a dumb dumb alien around Lana, but he's superman when she's gone. So Lana should visit Pete in Wichita or wherever he moved to...and leave Clark to face his destiny! Besides that Clana has been beaten with a stick to a point where now all teh chemistry is gone and burried. Something new that does not involve Lana-worshipping is all we are asking for! Maybe some evil Lex? or a Supermanly Clark? how about a Lois reporter???

11-24-2007, 06:42 AM	#13
Batfan114 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 325	now,now lets hurt innocent bystanders. My friend what the ladies are trying to say is this. First of all lets try with another character. Do you remember how the Luthers were in the first few episodes. They were ruthless. They would kill or have killed off anyone who crosses them. Some one stole from them and they were found dead in some other city. Now lets go to lana,

11-24-2007, 06:47 AM	#14
Batfan114 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 325	Now lets go to lana, she stole 10 million from lex, tried to frame him and kiddnapped lionel. Yet the luthors some how are her loose their brains and balls and let her live. All they did was threaten her. WOW that did alot of good. The writers are going backwards here. The 2 most ruthless people ever and here they are letting the squirel girl go. that's what cecil44 and kishagirl92 are trying to say. For some reason people get dumb and gutless around this twit and it has to stop. When she's not around all is well. So get rid of her.

11-24-2007, 06:50 AM	#15
Batfan114 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 325	lets have her horribly disfigured in some explosion and see if this theory that lana's minions here have that her beauty is what's important. Lets see if she's still loved by all who worship her beauty since that's their main argument. Oh but she soo beautiful. Well lets take that away and see if everything else she does holds any more merit.

11-24-2007, 09:09 AM	#16
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	Read the message I responded to and you won't need to ask. It said it was Clark's fault, not Lana's.

11-24-2007, 10:16 AM	#17
kishagirl92 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 239	The fault is on both Lana and Clark. The final decision to stay there on the farm is Clark's fault for being stupid, but the CAUSE of that final decision was Lana (her presence turns everyone into retards) which is why she is to be blamed as well. Just like in Batfan's case of the Luthors, the fault is on both Lana and the Luthors. The decision not to blast her ass after all she did is the Luthors fault for being stupid, but the CAUSE of that decision was Lana (everyone has bigger balls when she's not around). You know that Clark would never condone thievery, attempted murder, fraud, or kipnapping. These are serious crimes no matter what the cir!@#!@stances are, but he would for his precious Lana. In her presence he suddenly loses his intelligence when it comes to decision making. He is supposed to be morally just no matter what.

11-24-2007, 10:17 AM	#18
kishagirl92 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 239	And you know that the Luthors would never let anyone who victimized them the way she did off the hook. Like Cecil said, more people have died by their hands for doing much much less worse than that. The Luthors are ruthless. Oh, but not when it comes to Lana. They dare not touch her. She's the Lolly-Pop Pink Princess of Smallville. oops, I'm sorry.. That's Lanaville. She doesn't have to suffer for any of her consequences. Let's just put the blame on someone else so she won't have to suffer, let's just call it even, it was my fault, you can commit as many crimes as you want your highness and I shall suffer all the consequences for you. PLEASE!! Never in a million years would the Luthors do that for anyone else.... only in the presence of her highness do they get all soft and cushy and lose all their balls!!!!

11-24-2007, 12:40 PM	#20
Batfan114 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 325	I say jullian kills lana thinking it would make him look good to lex. Lex kills jullian, and he can now go on to being his destine evil self. Clark would be up set and would never want anyone going through that pain since he loved the holy squirrel so he becomes superman. Then every one can move on with their destiny.