Spoilers from DARKUFO on season finale - Page 3

rfortson · 05-15-2007, 06:22 PM

Don't read if you have not read the spoiler/foiler!

I don't think that it makes a whole lot of sense for many reasons.

1) The described deaths are very generic and have no detail.....Jack describes a scenario where they would be placing dynamite in the marked tents in order to "blow them all to hell!" This guy claims Friendly goes down from a simple gun shot (ok, maybe), but then says Hurley runs someone over with a van??? ON THE BEACH? I question this nonsense as guessing based off known deaths and this fact alone leads me to believe that just like last year some idiot created these descriptions in his head ....anyone remember the foiler last year where someone goes into the "Door" hatch and is in the "real world" again?? Same **** here in my opinion.

2) He also does this with Charlie's death.....no explanation of what goes on in "THe Looking Glass" but just that somehow Mikhail is there and BOOM! BS!

3) Again, the Locke scene starts off with rumored information that Walt is back in some capacity....this guy guesses that it is the dripping wet, not really there Walt that Shannon saw....too easy....then proceeds to say that Locke just up and throws a knife into Naomi before she can send the signal??? What happened to her stroy being fake??? That is just dropped...her "not being alone" is just dropped??? The girls in the "Looking Glass" are just dropped??? Come on....BS!

4) Crazy ass John Locke....the man on his own mission just backs down??? BS! Where is Ben in all this??? Rouseau??? Locke is heading towards taking over the Others and you want me to believe that the show is taking this turn??? Come on!

5) Where is the snake in the mailbox??? The twist about Jack and Kate and "getting back" is not representative of a snake in the mailbox. This title suggests that someone is not who they say they are or someone is somewhere unexpected and it surprises everyone and changes the course of the show.....shockingly jumping out and biting when you least expect it......this is not what is described.....it also does not jive with the "many rooms to a house" clue given to us from Darlton or basically all other spoiler talk.

I just don't see this as legit at all and I hope I am right because I do not want to be spoiled on this finale now that I read that....it made feel like I just ate McDOnalds in the middle of a diet bad. The scenario is pretty cool though....the big picture not the minor details he screws up.....

Also, if this is true then I am guessing that when Penny's crew "finds" the electromagnetic anomaly in the season 2 finale that we were actually watching a flash forward there too and it was her with Desmond laying next to her assisting Jack, Kate and the other survivors in finding the island again so they could all go back there and escape their troubles by living in a perfect society like Dharma tried to do. Who knows for sure...we will see though.

jimmy12345 · 05-16-2007, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OxfordAngel

I succumbed....

ooooooooooh how could i not!!!!

I wont coment on it but contrari to what everyone says

DONT READ IT!! ITLL MAKE A HELL OF AN EPISODE TO WATCH!

you're a bad person. lol. the others wouldn't recruit you.....:P

jimmy12345 · 05-16-2007, 02:23 AM

i don't want the spoiler to be true and one of the main reasons i disregarded it was because i thought 'the looking glass' was a poor name for a Dharma station. I figured it was a poor attempt to incorporate the name of finale into the spoiler. this maybe confirms that it is, to my distaste, true, god dammit!
-jimmy

05-16-2007, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OxfordAngel

I succumbed....

ooooooooooh how could i not!!!!

I wont coment on it but contrari to what everyone says

DONT READ IT!! ITLL MAKE A HELL OF AN EPISODE TO WATCH!

HA....no willpower.....your such a quitter.....what happened to counting to ten?, ah well looks like I'll be the only person on the forum who'll be truely shocked and excited after the Finale! Then again I've still gotta stick my head in the sand for a week and a bit.
That includes not returning to this thread....although the thread title sort of speaks for itself and I shouldn't have read it in the first place.

Muz · 05-16-2007, 11:56 AM

Sorry but i am not prepared to take all this "newbie" ****e. I posted them in the damn spoiler section you retards!

Granted, i didn't know someone else had posted it but i get ridiculed for not mentioning it is a spoiler when i did? then ridiculed for not posting in the spoiler section when i did?

Grow up people. I was merely posting a spoiler that was on a site in case no one had seen it and they wanted to...you didn't have to read it

OxfordAngel · 05-16-2007, 04:25 PM

yes I know the others wouldnt recruit me but then again i rather be recruited by richard alpert by himself

yeh i admit my weakness, but in my defense i wont be able to get the next episode by friday.... i mean this whole tread is like one of those itches you just have to scratch!!

honestly who has the willpower not to read it WHO?? !! -i certainly dont

and Muz, finally it was a great spoiler, sod the whole newbie stuff!

05-16-2007, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OxfordAngel

honestly who has the willpower not to read it WHO?? !! -i certainly dont.

Erm....at the expense of sounding like a broken record and not being one to gloat....that person would be me!
Yet again I have infiltrated the thread without succombing to the Spoilerfont....it's almost like a game now, I thrive from the danger of it, it's like russian roulette with spoilers.

Muz.......don't even worry about it, we've all got to start posting somewhere we were all New posters once......I've had more flamings than a Burger King....but I can't help keep coming back for more.

jimmy12345 · 05-17-2007, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OxfordAngel

yes I know the others wouldnt recruit me but then again i rather be recruited by richard alpert by himself

yeh i admit my weakness, but in my defense i wont be able to get the next episode by friday.... i mean this whole tread is like one of those itches you just have to scratch!!

honestly who has the willpower not to read it WHO?? !! -i certainly dont

and Muz, finally it was a great spoiler, sod the whole newbie stuff!

yeah muz it was, you god damn newbie....hehe, charlie said newbie in greatest hits. lol.

clueless1der · 05-17-2007, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy12345

yeah muz it was, you god damn newbie....hehe, charlie said newbie in greatest hits. lol.

I caught that too, and had a giggle.

Lockette · 05-17-2007, 03:37 PM

I gave in, I read it - But I still tell myself " That doesn't mean it's true" so that I don't feel totally spoiled.

However I don't find any fault with the OP - the title was very clear.

05-15-2007, 06:22 PM	#21
rfortson Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 36	I just wanted to make a few comments about this spoiler/foiler Don't read if you have not read the spoiler/foiler! I don't think that it makes a whole lot of sense for many reasons. 1) The described deaths are very generic and have no detail.....Jack describes a scenario where they would be placing dynamite in the marked tents in order to "blow them all to hell!" This guy claims Friendly goes down from a simple gun shot (ok, maybe), but then says Hurley runs someone over with a van??? ON THE BEACH? I question this nonsense as guessing based off known deaths and this fact alone leads me to believe that just like last year some idiot created these descriptions in his head ....anyone remember the foiler last year where someone goes into the "Door" hatch and is in the "real world" again?? Same **** here in my opinion. 2) He also does this with Charlie's death.....no explanation of what goes on in "THe Looking Glass" but just that somehow Mikhail is there and BOOM! BS! 3) Again, the Locke scene starts off with rumored information that Walt is back in some capacity....this guy guesses that it is the dripping wet, not really there Walt that Shannon saw....too easy....then proceeds to say that Locke just up and throws a knife into Naomi before she can send the signal??? What happened to her stroy being fake??? That is just dropped...her "not being alone" is just dropped??? The girls in the "Looking Glass" are just dropped??? Come on....BS! 4) Crazy ass John Locke....the man on his own mission just backs down??? BS! Where is Ben in all this??? Rouseau??? Locke is heading towards taking over the Others and you want me to believe that the show is taking this turn??? Come on! 5) Where is the snake in the mailbox??? The twist about Jack and Kate and "getting back" is not representative of a snake in the mailbox. This title suggests that someone is not who they say they are or someone is somewhere unexpected and it surprises everyone and changes the course of the show.....shockingly jumping out and biting when you least expect it......this is not what is described.....it also does not jive with the "many rooms to a house" clue given to us from Darlton or basically all other spoiler talk. I just don't see this as legit at all and I hope I am right because I do not want to be spoiled on this finale now that I read that....it made feel like I just ate McDOnalds in the middle of a diet bad. The scenario is pretty cool though....the big picture not the minor details he screws up..... Also, if this is true then I am guessing that when Penny's crew "finds" the electromagnetic anomaly in the season 2 finale that we were actually watching a flash forward there too and it was her with Desmond laying next to her assisting Jack, Kate and the other survivors in finding the island again so they could all go back there and escape their troubles by living in a perfect society like Dharma tried to do. Who knows for sure...we will see though.

05-16-2007, 02:23 AM	#23
jimmy12345 Moderator Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Birmingham, England Posts: 1,035	About Greatest Hits Promo 2 i don't want the spoiler to be true and one of the main reasons i disregarded it was because i thought 'the looking glass' was a poor name for a Dharma station. I figured it was a poor attempt to incorporate the name of finale into the spoiler. this maybe confirms that it is, to my distaste, true, god dammit! -jimmy __________________ http://thelifeofjambonthenam.blogspot.com/ Anyone who wants a copy of the banner, linking to DocArzt's new spoiler site, to add to their sig, just PM me.

05-16-2007, 04:25 PM	#26
OxfordAngel Junior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: oxford england Posts: 6	cheaters blues yes I know the others wouldnt recruit me but then again i rather be recruited by richard alpert by himself yeh i admit my weakness, but in my defense i wont be able to get the next episode by friday.... i mean this whole tread is like one of those itches you just have to scratch!! honestly who has the willpower not to read it WHO?? !! -i certainly dont and Muz, finally it was a great spoiler, sod the whole newbie stuff!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-16-2007, 11:56 AM	#25
Muz Junior Member Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 5	Sorry but i am not prepared to take all this "newbie" ****e. I posted them in the damn spoiler section you retards! Granted, i didn't know someone else had posted it but i get ridiculed for not mentioning it is a spoiler when i did? then ridiculed for not posting in the spoiler section when i did? Grow up people. I was merely posting a spoiler that was on a site in case no one had seen it and they wanted to...you didn't have to read it

05-17-2007, 03:37 PM	#30
Lockette Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 47	I gave in, I read it - But I still tell myself " That doesn't mean it's true" so that I don't feel totally spoiled. However I don't find any fault with the OP - the title was very clear.