something u have noticed that could be a big hint to something else ? post here !! - Page 2

CaptVimes · 10-17-2007, 12:29 AM

First post and a great forum

I think Nathan is dead. I think Peter is mascarading as Nathan by using the illusion power of Candice though I dont think they have been shown meeting they were certainly close enough in the final of episode 1.

This would mean that he is seeing his dead brother in the same way Jessica sees Niki .

As for Peter there have been a lot of assuptions he is really Peter Petrelli but is he really and I think the godsend F tatoo showing briefly was a hint to that. I think he is linked somehow to Sylar not being able to use his abilities.

shannon2903 · 10-17-2007, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptVimes

First post and a great forum

I think Nathan is dead. I think Peter is mascarading as Nathan by using the illusion power of Candice though I dont think they have been shown meeting they were certainly close enough in the final of episode 1.

This would mean that he is seeing his dead brother in the same way Jessica sees Niki .

As for Peter there have been a lot of assuptions he is really Peter Petrelli but is he really and I think the godsend F tatoo showing briefly was a hint to that. I think he is linked somehow to Sylar not being able to use his abilities.

Not sure if I'm 100% behind the Nathan/Peter idea. Love the Peter/Syler idea, if it's not true they should make it true.

fatj0 · 10-17-2007, 12:51 AM

ummm... so the story arcs involving the characters in these theories are also decoys? just trying to find out where you're at. at first it seemed like an assumption that might have been made having not seen the episodes but...?

CaptVimes · 10-20-2007, 07:31 PM

I am not sure what you mean. The writers have used the trick of not revealing 100% of what is going on with the main characters as we have followed them through their story arcs.

fatj0 · 10-20-2007, 11:08 PM

i'm saying that peter, nathan and sylar all have geographically separated story arcs... for your theory to make sense at least one of these three characters would have to remain unseen.

oldounce · 10-21-2007, 11:10 AM

if some notice that Claire's lost car is similar to the car which the thief say he picked up from California?

is that the same car?

I_Remember_U_Your_Like_Me · 10-22-2007, 03:54 AM

Did anyone notice that Kaito Nakamura was tackled off the roof of the Deveaux building the same way that Peter Petrelli tackled Sylar off the roof of Union Wells High, except it was Peter who got up an ran away not Sylar this time.

DID PETER KILL KAITO NAKAMURA?

I think I know why too.

Please note this is a theory not a spoiler, it may be wrong or right, what do you think?

meimei42 · 10-22-2007, 06:28 AM

^^ I've thought for awhile it was Peter who tackled him. But I think he was being mind controlled. I've convinced myself that Matt's dad has the power of possession and so when Hiro's dad said "I can't believe its you out of everyone" or whatever he said, I think its because he recognized that the person on the roof was possessed.

But that is just MY theory.

And yeah about the car, someone around here mentioned that, I do think honestly thats what it has to be. Heroes wouldn't just have a car stolen and that be the end of that. It had to the the catalyst for something else. I really can't wait to see how that all plays itself out.

chapablo · 10-22-2007, 01:26 PM

When Mr. Nakamura was attacked, a detective investigating the homicide joked around, but possibly foreshadowed an interesting possibility. He suggested that the only way only 1 body would still be there is that the other would fly away. West was obvioulsy reached by the Company, he has the marks to prove it. Is it possible that either knowingly or unkowingly, he flew over to NY, pushed Mr. Nakamura off, then flew away before hitting the ground?

chapablo · 10-22-2007, 01:29 PM

On Claire's car... wasn't hers an SUV? Sylar, Maya, and Alejandro are in a sedan.

10-22-2007, 06:28 AM	#18
meimei42 Moderator Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 11,818	^^ I've thought for awhile it was Peter who tackled him. But I think he was being mind controlled. I've convinced myself that Matt's dad has the power of possession and so when Hiro's dad said "I can't believe its you out of everyone" or whatever he said, I think its because he recognized that the person on the roof was possessed. But that is just MY theory. And yeah about the car, someone around here mentioned that, I do think honestly thats what it has to be. Heroes wouldn't just have a car stolen and that be the end of that. It had to the the catalyst for something else. I really can't wait to see how that all plays itself out. __________________ AV by ewlyn on Livejournal

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-17-2007, 12:29 AM	#11
CaptVimes Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6	First post and a great forum I think Nathan is dead. I think Peter is mascarading as Nathan by using the illusion power of Candice though I dont think they have been shown meeting they were certainly close enough in the final of episode 1. This would mean that he is seeing his dead brother in the same way Jessica sees Niki . As for Peter there have been a lot of assuptions he is really Peter Petrelli but is he really and I think the godsend F tatoo showing briefly was a hint to that. I think he is linked somehow to Sylar not being able to use his abilities.

10-17-2007, 12:51 AM	#13
fatj0 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 368	ummm... so the story arcs involving the characters in these theories are also decoys? just trying to find out where you're at. at first it seemed like an assumption that might have been made having not seen the episodes but...?

10-20-2007, 07:31 PM	#14
CaptVimes Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6	I am not sure what you mean. The writers have used the trick of not revealing 100% of what is going on with the main characters as we have followed them through their story arcs.

10-20-2007, 11:08 PM	#15
fatj0 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 368	i'm saying that peter, nathan and sylar all have geographically separated story arcs... for your theory to make sense at least one of these three characters would have to remain unseen.

10-21-2007, 11:10 AM	#16
oldounce Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 131	if some notice that Claire's lost car is similar to the car which the thief say he picked up from California? is that the same car?

10-22-2007, 03:54 AM	#17
I_Remember_U_Your_Like_Me Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 276	Did anyone notice that Kaito Nakamura was tackled off the roof of the Deveaux building the same way that Peter Petrelli tackled Sylar off the roof of Union Wells High, except it was Peter who got up an ran away not Sylar this time. DID PETER KILL KAITO NAKAMURA? I think I know why too. Please note this is a theory not a spoiler, it may be wrong or right, what do you think?

10-22-2007, 01:26 PM	#19
chapablo Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 20	When Mr. Nakamura was attacked, a detective investigating the homicide joked around, but possibly foreshadowed an interesting possibility. He suggested that the only way only 1 body would still be there is that the other would fly away. West was obvioulsy reached by the Company, he has the marks to prove it. Is it possible that either knowingly or unkowingly, he flew over to NY, pushed Mr. Nakamura off, then flew away before hitting the ground?

10-22-2007, 01:29 PM	#20
chapablo Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 20	On Claire's car... wasn't hers an SUV? Sylar, Maya, and Alejandro are in a sedan.