2007 Emmy Analysis: 'Grey's Anatomy' - Page 3

Guest · 07-20-2007, 01:10 PM

Jenny,got ya?some people just get on my nerves,when they complain about hate then return it with more HATRED,,,it just doesn't make sense to me,,you return it with love,,do you know where we would all be if we are all judged this way..(am black)but i totally disagree with imus firing..what the hell does that do,,the man apologize sincerely,,you accept,,,am maybe watch him become a role model for others..Just my opinion..i just dont think its this fight that bothers people,.am beginining to think its someelse and that bothers me..enough said,,,unless somebody wants to make a smartass statement..lol

Guest · 07-20-2007, 01:41 PM

Shouldn't we proud for all cast members regardless of whether we like them or not, it is still a nomination for out show and we all love the show.

I personally think they all deserve it, but I am particularly happy for TR. I have been a big fan of his from day one.

And yes, Sandra Oh rocks!

Guest · 07-20-2007, 06:50 PM

I love all the actors on Grey's and I think all that were nominated deserve it. I do think the writers need to pull things together for next season and do it fast. Last season was the worst season by far. I hope in season 4 the actors will have better scrips to work with. I LOVE this show!! I just hope season 4 will rock like Shonda has said. I can't wait to find out!

Florence · 07-20-2007, 11:50 PM

I think only Ellen or Patrick deserved a nomination this year. The writing was so bad, their characters became such stereotypes. Despite that, they dealt with it pretty well.
I wish they could intervene more next season to make the writers come back to what they were in season 1. I miss their chemistry scenes. They are strong and belong to each other.
TR Knight as best supporting actor? Why? Because of The IW behaviour? Well It's not a good enoogh reason. IW is a much better actor than him. As for Chandra, she was "'absent" most of the season??? Sandra was not particularly good.

Guest · 07-21-2007, 11:31 PM

Why TR Knight? How about because he did an amazing job all season long, as he always does. He was amazing from his dad's death to his guilt over his feelings for Izzie. The man is constantly good and it was about time he got some recognition. On the Emmy vote, he is way ahead in the popular vote, so obviously others agree.

And patrick a better actor than TR? In your dreams.

Guest · 07-22-2007, 07:53 PM

Seriously, I have to ask: What is considered when it comes to Emmy nominations. If it is the reception that a show got from the majority of the viewing public, then Grey's did not necessarily deserve the best drama nod. If it is what one feels after the stories are unravelled, and people break up or die, then Grey's did not deserve it. But if it is the writing, the acting, and the overall sense that the show is worth one hour a week, then yes in fact, they deserved it. I can understand people are mad about WHAT happened on Grey's, but you can't honestly be upset about HOW it happened - and to that point, I am refering to the writing and acting. It was brilliant television all season long, as usual, but the only difference is it didnt make the viewer feel all warm and fuzzy inside at the end.
I feel all the acting noms were worthy, especially that of Katherine Heigl who for me has been the heart and soul of brilliant acting on the show since the beginning - especially the latter part

Guest · 07-22-2007, 07:55 PM

(continued)...of season 2 and the majority of this season. She got ripped off at the Golden Globes, and I hope she takes it home this season. That said, everyone else was pretty good too. But how can you be mad about Derek or Meredith not being nominated - neither have ever showed extraordinary acting, besides the occasional Meredith scene that makes you cry, (2.15, 2.16, 2.17, 3.14, 3.17)

That said, I'm happy

Guest · 07-25-2007, 04:11 AM

I have found that Derek and Meredith have become the two most annoying characters on the show! Why would you be nominated for being annoying! TR Knight and Katherine Heigl have both performed beautifully and deserve to win.

MERDER · 07-25-2007, 08:16 AM

no they don't patrick and ellen really deserved to win and shonda let them down.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-20-2007, 01:10 PM	#21
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	Jenny,got ya?some people just get on my nerves,when they complain about hate then return it with more HATRED,,,it just doesn't make sense to me,,you return it with love,,do you know where we would all be if we are all judged this way..(am black)but i totally disagree with imus firing..what the hell does that do,,the man apologize sincerely,,you accept,,,am maybe watch him become a role model for others..Just my opinion..i just dont think its this fight that bothers people,.am beginining to think its someelse and that bothers me..enough said,,,unless somebody wants to make a smartass statement..lol

07-20-2007, 01:41 PM	#22
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	Shouldn't we proud for all cast members regardless of whether we like them or not, it is still a nomination for out show and we all love the show. I personally think they all deserve it, but I am particularly happy for TR. I have been a big fan of his from day one. And yes, Sandra Oh rocks!

07-20-2007, 06:50 PM	#23
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	I love all the actors on Grey's and I think all that were nominated deserve it. I do think the writers need to pull things together for next season and do it fast. Last season was the worst season by far. I hope in season 4 the actors will have better scrips to work with. I LOVE this show!! I just hope season 4 will rock like Shonda has said. I can't wait to find out!

07-20-2007, 11:50 PM	#24
Florence Junior Member Join Date: Dec 1969 Posts: 8	I think only Ellen or Patrick deserved a nomination this year. The writing was so bad, their characters became such stereotypes. Despite that, they dealt with it pretty well. I wish they could intervene more next season to make the writers come back to what they were in season 1. I miss their chemistry scenes. They are strong and belong to each other. TR Knight as best supporting actor? Why? Because of The IW behaviour? Well It's not a good enoogh reason. IW is a much better actor than him. As for Chandra, she was "'absent" most of the season??? Sandra was not particularly good.

07-21-2007, 11:31 PM	#25
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	Why TR Knight? How about because he did an amazing job all season long, as he always does. He was amazing from his dad's death to his guilt over his feelings for Izzie. The man is constantly good and it was about time he got some recognition. On the Emmy vote, he is way ahead in the popular vote, so obviously others agree. And patrick a better actor than TR? In your dreams.

07-22-2007, 07:53 PM	#26
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	Seriously, I have to ask: What is considered when it comes to Emmy nominations. If it is the reception that a show got from the majority of the viewing public, then Grey's did not necessarily deserve the best drama nod. If it is what one feels after the stories are unravelled, and people break up or die, then Grey's did not deserve it. But if it is the writing, the acting, and the overall sense that the show is worth one hour a week, then yes in fact, they deserved it. I can understand people are mad about WHAT happened on Grey's, but you can't honestly be upset about HOW it happened - and to that point, I am refering to the writing and acting. It was brilliant television all season long, as usual, but the only difference is it didnt make the viewer feel all warm and fuzzy inside at the end. I feel all the acting noms were worthy, especially that of Katherine Heigl who for me has been the heart and soul of brilliant acting on the show since the beginning - especially the latter part

07-22-2007, 07:55 PM	#27
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	(continued)...of season 2 and the majority of this season. She got ripped off at the Golden Globes, and I hope she takes it home this season. That said, everyone else was pretty good too. But how can you be mad about Derek or Meredith not being nominated - neither have ever showed extraordinary acting, besides the occasional Meredith scene that makes you cry, (2.15, 2.16, 2.17, 3.14, 3.17) That said, I'm happy

07-25-2007, 04:11 AM	#28
Guest Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 0	I have found that Derek and Meredith have become the two most annoying characters on the show! Why would you be nominated for being annoying! TR Knight and Katherine Heigl have both performed beautifully and deserve to win.

07-25-2007, 08:16 AM	#29
MERDER Junior Member Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2	no they don't patrick and ellen really deserved to win and shonda let them down.